Sunday, March 23, 2014

Sexuality in the Victorian Era: Was it Different from Today?


By Brandi Tillison
 
Before the masturbation scare, it seemed like sexuality was not much different. The major difference is shame. It seemed to be a known fact that a woman’s husband could go see a prostitute due to some disillusion of not wanting to taint his wife. [1]An example of just how sexually free men were, a staggering number of over 100,000 soldiers was diagnosed with gonorrhea. From my biology class last semester, there was a spike in the 1970’s and 80’s, but now in present day it’s only between 100,000 and 200,000. A span of over a century and not much has changed. So STD trends haven’t had any dramatic increase like certain people would have other believe.
 
     As men were free to express their sexuality, women had some freedom. After the Second Great Awakening, the use of birth control was more accepted. This is admitting that yes women have sex, and they maybe enjoy it in a way. Back then some women could become prostitutes if they wanted to, but that led to a whole new level of risk. Women seemed to have had freedom then the 1900’s started and you had more conservative values coming about, and people trying to have a war on sexuality. Notions such as women were whores and other degrading words, aren’t from present time. Women were commonly viewed as being virtuous, virgins, and moral compasses. [2]A perfect example would be sentimental novels. These novels were big in the mid-19th century and portrayed women as ‘clean’ beings and should act as such. Much of this same sentiment last today. Women who have multiple sexual partners and enjoy sex are seen as loose and too sexual, but men are just being men. At least in the Victorian Era there couldn’t be a blog dedicated to how loose you are and there was more privacy.
 
     This leads to the topic of privacy pertaining to sexuality. While there wasn’t an easy accessible webpage about you, that doesn’t mean there wouldn’t be papers or court trials about you. An example would be Oscar Wilde, who was charged with sodomy. So people were still rather invested in other people’s sex lives like today. So the question is was sexuality different in the Victorian Era from today? From what history says no.




[1] Amelia, Cotter. Suite 101, "Prostitution and Venereal Disease in the Civil War." Last modified April 22, 2010. Accessed March 23, 2014. https://suite101.com/a/prostitution-and-venereal-disease-in-the-civil-war-a228450.
[2] Donna M., Campbell. Washington State University, "Domestic or Sentimental Fiction, 1820-1865." Last modified July 4, 2013. Accessed March 23, 2014. http://public.wsu.edu/~campbelld/amlit/domestic.htm.

No comments:

Post a Comment